[pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH 2/3] module-filter-apply: Don't implement policy in module-device-manager

Tanu Kaskinen tanuk at iki.fi
Tue May 10 15:28:33 UTC 2016


On Sat, 2016-05-07 at 10:43 +0530, Arun Raghavan wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-05-06 at 15:40 +0300, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> > On Fri, 2016-05-06 at 13:43 +0530, arun at accosted.net wrote:
> > > @@ -520,6 +525,9 @@ static pa_hook_result_t sink_input_move_finish_cb(pa_core *core, pa_sink_input *
> > >      if (pa_proplist_gets(i->proplist, PA_PROP_FILTER_APPLY_MOVING))
> > >          return PA_HOOK_OK;
> > >  
> > > +    /* If we're managing m-d-m.ignore on this, remove and re-add if we're continuing to manage it */
>> > This comment gets out of date after you rename the property in the next
> > patch. (Same for the source output code.)
> 
> Out-of-date in what sense? We do want to continue the same behaviour of
> only managing the property on the stream if we actually loaded a filter
> for it.

In the sense that the comment mentions "m-d-m.ignore", while the actual
property name is "m-d-m.auto_filtered".

-- 
Tanu


More information about the pulseaudio-discuss mailing list