[pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH 2/3] module-filter-apply: Don't implement policy in module-device-manager
Arun Raghavan
arun at arunraghavan.net
Wed May 11 03:50:57 UTC 2016
On Tue, 10 May 2016, at 08:58 PM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-05-07 at 10:43 +0530, Arun Raghavan wrote:
> > On Fri, 2016-05-06 at 15:40 +0300, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2016-05-06 at 13:43 +0530, arun at accosted.net wrote:
> > > > @@ -520,6 +525,9 @@ static pa_hook_result_t sink_input_move_finish_cb(pa_core *core, pa_sink_input *
> > > > if (pa_proplist_gets(i->proplist, PA_PROP_FILTER_APPLY_MOVING))
> > > > return PA_HOOK_OK;
> > > >
> > > > + /* If we're managing m-d-m.ignore on this, remove and re-add if we're continuing to manage it */
> > >
> > > This comment gets out of date after you rename the property in the next
> > > patch. (Same for the source output code.)
> >
> > Out-of-date in what sense? We do want to continue the same behaviour of
> > only managing the property on the stream if we actually loaded a filter
> > for it.
>
> In the sense that the comment mentions "m-d-m.ignore", while the actual
> property name is "m-d-m.auto_filtered".
Ah, right. Fixed that.
-- Arun
More information about the pulseaudio-discuss
mailing list