bugzilla entries for the X11R6.7 release

[Harold L Hunt II]

Jim Gettys wrote:
> Yes, these components are clearly bogus.

Before I forget to chime in: "server" is too generic of a component. 
The default owner for xfree86 ddx bugs is not going to be the same as 
the default owner for cygwin ddx bugs, etc.  "server" should be retired 
or maybe renamed as "server-generic" for issues outside of a particular 
ddx, then we should introduce once component for each ddx under active 
development "ddx-cygwin", "ddx-darwin", etc. or "server-cygwin", 
"server-darwin", etc.

Harold

> We need a better list.
> 
> I can add them if someone tells me what to add.
> 
> Stuart, what are the bugzilla components you set up for XF86?
>                           - Jim
> 
> 
> On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 13:10, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> 
>>One small thing I forgot on the call this morning - before the release
>>an X11R6.7 release should be added to bugzilla (and perhaps a CVS-HEAD
>>or CVS-CURRENT release?).
>>
>>Also, the list of components under "xorg" leaves a lot that doesn't
>>really fit in to any category.  The current list is:
>>	cvs
>>	imake
>>	server
>>	xlib
>>	xt
>>
>>At a minimum I think we need to add components for docs, other libs,
>>other programs, and maybe a generic catch-all "other".