bugzilla entries for the X11R6.7 release

[Jim Gettys]

I spent a lot of time this afternoon working on the components.

Please take a look at what is there now and let me know what you
think should change.

We also need to do something about where the bug reports
get sent.
                          - Jim

On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 23:38, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
> Jim Gettys wrote:
> > Yes, these components are clearly bogus.
> 
> Before I forget to chime in: "server" is too generic of a component. 
> The default owner for xfree86 ddx bugs is not going to be the same as 
> the default owner for cygwin ddx bugs, etc.  "server" should be retired 
> or maybe renamed as "server-generic" for issues outside of a particular 
> ddx, then we should introduce once component for each ddx under active 
> development "ddx-cygwin", "ddx-darwin", etc. or "server-cygwin", 
> "server-darwin", etc.
> 
> Harold
> 
> > We need a better list.
> > 
> > I can add them if someone tells me what to add.
> > 
> > Stuart, what are the bugzilla components you set up for XF86?
> >                           - Jim
> > 
> > 
> > On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 13:10, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> > 
> >>One small thing I forgot on the call this morning - before the release
> >>an X11R6.7 release should be added to bugzilla (and perhaps a CVS-HEAD
> >>or CVS-CURRENT release?).
> >>
> >>Also, the list of components under "xorg" leaves a lot that doesn't
> >>really fit in to any category.  The current list is:
> >>	cvs
> >>	imake
> >>	server
> >>	xlib
> >>	xt
> >>
> >>At a minimum I think we need to add components for docs, other libs,
> >>other programs, and maybe a generic catch-all "other".
> 
> _______________________________________________
> release-wranglers mailing list
> release-wranglers at freedesktop.org
> http://freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/release-wranglers
-- 
Jim Gettys <Jim.Gettys at hp.com>
HP Labs, Cambridge Research Laboratory