[SCIM] Will SCIM become a part of iiimf project?

[James Su]

Oh, my god. It seems that, we must distribute qt immodule as a separate 
package.

Regards
James Su

LiuCougar wrote:

>Oh, I just noticed that the scim-lib and qt_immodule has conflicting
>licenses: the former one is LGPL, while the latter is GPL
>
>Qt-based application can not be LGPLed, only GPL or BSD style are acceptable.
>
>What do you think?
>
>Regards,
>Cougar
>
>On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 10:20:50 +0800, James Su <suzhe at tsinghua.org.cn> wrote:
>  
>
>>Yes, it's ok.
>>It will be great if it can be shipped with scim 1.0
>>
>>Regards
>>James Su
>>
>>
>>LiuCougar wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 20:56:51 +0900 (JST), UTUMI Hirosi
>>><utuhiro78 at yahoo.co.jp> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>Cougar, I'm waiting for your "qt-immodule support for scim". :-)
>>>>Thank you for your great work!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>all the fundimental functions work well now, next I will merge it into
>>>the scim-lib cvs, probably under the path
>>>
>>>extras/qt_immodule
>>>
>>>Is that ok, james?
>>>
>>>Cougar
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>scim mailing list
>>>scim at freedesktop.org
>>>http://freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/scim
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>    
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>scim mailing list
>scim at freedesktop.org
>http://freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/scim
>
>  
>