[Spice-devel] 0.10.x status / plans for spice for Fedora 16
Alon Levy
alevy at redhat.com
Tue Jul 19 03:11:25 PDT 2011
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 11:52:28AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 07/19/2011 11:33 AM, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> >Hi Hans,
> >
> >On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 11:20:23AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >>Can we tag a 0.9.0 release from spice git master ? and release tarbals for this
> >>at this moment in time? If not can we make a short to do list with things which
> >>needs to be done before we can do this?
> >
ok, so I guess that's a good idea. Just tag and release (with changelog I guess?)
But what about 0.8.2 (changing subject here for a second) - I am going to try
to cherry-pick anything that applies easily (read: no RedChannel stuff) or that
I need for RHEL (read: async+s3). How does that sound?
> >I'm all for starting the 0.10 release process as early as possible.
> >
> >>Also given that Fedora 16 alpha freeze is approaching, and we don't have
> >>a 0.9.x yet, what is the plan for Fedora 16, stick with 0.8.x, or are
> >>we going to do a 0.9.0 RSN and get it in before the freeze?
> >
> >Can you expand more on that? When is the alpha freeze, what does it mean if
> >we get 0.9.0 in it?
>
> The alpha freeze is the feature freeze, not getting 0.9.x in, does not
> mean much, we could still go to 0.9.x later, but we then can no longer
> advertise that we're doing so as a feature. And it is more or less
> discouraged to do version rebases after the feature freeze.
>
> >That we'll be allowed to update the package to 0.10.0
> >when it's released?
>
> Yes, if we get 0.9.x in we are allowed to go to 0.10.0 later.
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
> _______________________________________________
> Spice-devel mailing list
> Spice-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
More information about the Spice-devel
mailing list