[Spice-devel] [PATCH 4/7] spice-ppc: fix glz magic endianess
Yaniv Kaul
ykaul at redhat.com
Wed Aug 8 02:55:34 PDT 2012
On 08/08/2012 12:34 PM, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 05:24:30AM -0400, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 03:43:11PM -0300, Erlon Cruz wrote:
>>>> From: Erlon Cruz <erlon.cruz at br.flextronics.com>
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Erlon R. Cruz <erlon.cruz at br.flextronics.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio
>>>> <Fabiano.Fidêncio at fit-tecnologia.org.br>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Rafael F. Santos
>>>> <Rafael.Santos at fit-tecnologia.org.br>
>>>> ---
>>>> server/glz_encoder.c | 2 +-
>>>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/server/glz_encoder.c b/server/glz_encoder.c
>>>> index 1ec1f9b..f8415a8 100644
>>>> --- a/server/glz_encoder.c
>>>> +++ b/server/glz_encoder.c
>>>> @@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ int glz_encode(GlzEncoderContext
>>>> *opaque_encoder,
>>>> encoder->cur_image.id = dict_image->id;
>>>> encoder->cur_image.first_win_seg = dict_image->first_seg;
>>>>
>>>> - encode_32(encoder, LZ_MAGIC);
>>>> + encode_32(encoder, htole32(LZ_MAGIC));
>> The correct thing to do here is drop LZ_MAGIC. No one needs it.
>> And the version stuff that follows it as well. It's useless.
> It's not useless to old clients as they won't be able to communicate with
> the server if these fields are not there. I think some people would hate us
> if we broke that ;)
>
> Christophe
Of course - this should all have a "if you are already touching this
field" notice/pledge.
Y.
More information about the Spice-devel
mailing list