[Spice-devel] [PATCH] Release 0.11.0
Marc-André Lureau
mlureau at redhat.com
Sat Jun 9 15:16:25 PDT 2012
Hi
----- Mensaje original -----
> I agree that we need to change it, but I find that page very
> confusing.
> According to point 2 at the bottom, since we are backward compatible
> but
> added interfaces, we should increment both ''current'' and ''age'',
> i.e.
> 2.0.3
This is the correct way. I was blindly following Gerd
reasoning from b718f59d4617067c589dae020d14bf4327e2fa62, which appears
to be invalid, since bumping age always should go with current.
This is also stated differently in the documentation:
"Also note that age must be less than or equal to the current interface number"
I don't know how we can fix it :-/
More information about the Spice-devel
mailing list