[Spice-devel] [PATCH] Release 0.11.0

Alon Levy alevy at redhat.com
Sat Jun 9 15:27:35 PDT 2012


On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 06:16:25PM -0400, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> Hi
> 
> ----- Mensaje original -----
> 
> > I agree that we need to change it, but I find that page very
> > confusing.
> > According to point 2 at the bottom, since we are backward compatible
> > but
> > added interfaces, we should increment both ''current'' and ''age'',
> > i.e.
> > 2.0.3
> 
> This is the correct way. I was blindly following Gerd
> reasoning from b718f59d4617067c589dae020d14bf4327e2fa62, which appears
> to be invalid, since bumping age always should go with current.
> 
> This is also stated differently in the documentation:
> "Also note that age must be less than or equal to the current interface number"
> 
> I don't know how we can fix it :-/

3.0.3?

I'll reread the page in the morning.


More information about the Spice-devel mailing list