[Spice-devel] vdagent protocol question

[Dietmar Maurer]

> > This makes it really hard to write nice code.
> 
> I don't think I would have done it if it was "really" hard. But I understand in your
> code it might be difficult for some reason.

It is not 'really' hard (but a bit 'ugly')

> > I wonder why it does not simply use the ‘opaque’ field of
> > VDAgentMessage instead?
> >
> 
> I have No idea what this opaque is for, but I prefer the information to be explicit.

I just read this:  http://spice-space.org/page/Whiteboard/AgentProtocol

According to that, this field is exactly for that use case.

> What if you consider it as a different message with a different structure
> somehow?

Why don't you simply always include those bytes instead?