[Spice-devel] [spice-gtk 03/11] Add missing (C) to copyright line
Daniel P. Berrange
berrange at redhat.com
Thu Oct 30 06:38:26 PDT 2014
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 02:28:25PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 02:02:27PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> > > Quoting GNU maintainer manual:
> > > https://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/html_node/Copyright-Notices.html
> > >
> > > "Alternatively, the ‘(C)’ or C-in-a-circle can be omitted entirely; the
> > > word ‘Copyright’ suffices."
> >
> > The rule which asks for that to be done is:
> > sc_copyright_format:
> > @require='Copyright .*Red 'Hat', Inc\.' \
> > containing='Copyright .*Red 'Hat \
> > halt='Red Hat copyright is missing Inc.' \
> > $(_sc_search_regexp)
> > @prohibit='Copyright [^(].*Red 'Hat \
> > halt='consistently use (C) in Red Hat copyright' \
> > $(_sc_search_regexp)
> > @prohibit='\<Red''Hat\>' \
> > halt='spell Red Hat as two words' \
> > $(_sc_search_regexp)
> >
> > I don't know if Red Hat legal department insists on the (C) being present.
> > I can reword the commit log to explicit it's only being enforced for Red
> > Hat's
> > copyright, or I can drop the patch.
> >
> >
> It might be specified by Red Hat legal somewhere, but then I wonder why
> there wouldn't be checks for that (in RH builds checks), so it's probably
> unneeded.
This syntax-check rule isn't about enforcing a legal requirement
but rather ensuring that we use a consist copyright header across
all source files.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
More information about the Spice-devel
mailing list