[Spice-devel] [spice-gtk 03/11] Add missing (C) to copyright line
Marc-André Lureau
marcandre.lureau at gmail.com
Thu Oct 30 06:28:25 PDT 2014
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau at redhat.com>
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 02:02:27PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> > Quoting GNU maintainer manual:
> > https://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/html_node/Copyright-Notices.html
> >
> > "Alternatively, the ‘(C)’ or C-in-a-circle can be omitted entirely; the
> > word ‘Copyright’ suffices."
>
> The rule which asks for that to be done is:
> sc_copyright_format:
> @require='Copyright .*Red 'Hat', Inc\.' \
> containing='Copyright .*Red 'Hat \
> halt='Red Hat copyright is missing Inc.' \
> $(_sc_search_regexp)
> @prohibit='Copyright [^(].*Red 'Hat \
> halt='consistently use (C) in Red Hat copyright' \
> $(_sc_search_regexp)
> @prohibit='\<Red''Hat\>' \
> halt='spell Red Hat as two words' \
> $(_sc_search_regexp)
>
> I don't know if Red Hat legal department insists on the (C) being present.
> I can reword the commit log to explicit it's only being enforced for Red
> Hat's
> copyright, or I can drop the patch.
>
>
It might be specified by Red Hat legal somewhere, but then I wonder why
there wouldn't be checks for that (in RH builds checks), so it's probably
unneeded.
--
Marc-André Lureau
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/spice-devel/attachments/20141030/e2fbee24/attachment.html>
More information about the Spice-devel
mailing list