[Spice-devel] [PATCH] inputs: Correct documentation of scancode arguments

[Benjamin Gilbert]

On 01/07/2015 07:27 AM, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 10:03 PM, Benjamin Gilbert <bgilbert at cs.cmu.edu> wrote:
>> The SPICE protocol uses XT (set 1) scancodes, not AT (set 2) scancodes.
> Right, it's XT (set 1). I think it's all also commonly called AT set 1
> though (at least in keymap.csv ;)

Works for me.

>> spice-gtk additionally expects a mangled version of AT scancodes, which
>> are then unmangled by spice_make_scancode().
> s/AT/XT :)

Whoops!  Revised message:

"AT scancodes" implies AT set 2, but the SPICE protocol expects
AT set 1.  spice-gtk additionally expects a mangled version of
set 1 scancodes, which are then unmangled by spice_make_scancode().

Thanks,
--Benjamin Gilbert