[Spice-devel] [PATCH] inputs: Correct documentation of scancode arguments

[Marc-André Lureau]

pushed thanks

On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 11:28 PM, Benjamin Gilbert <bgilbert at cs.cmu.edu> wrote:
> On 01/07/2015 07:27 AM, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 10:03 PM, Benjamin Gilbert <bgilbert at cs.cmu.edu>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> The SPICE protocol uses XT (set 1) scancodes, not AT (set 2) scancodes.
>>
>> Right, it's XT (set 1). I think it's all also commonly called AT set 1
>> though (at least in keymap.csv ;)
>
>
> Works for me.
>
>>> spice-gtk additionally expects a mangled version of AT scancodes, which
>>> are then unmangled by spice_make_scancode().
>>
>> s/AT/XT :)
>
>
> Whoops!  Revised message:
>
> "AT scancodes" implies AT set 2, but the SPICE protocol expects
> AT set 1.  spice-gtk additionally expects a mangled version of
> set 1 scancodes, which are then unmangled by spice_make_scancode().
>
> Thanks,
> --Benjamin Gilbert
>



-- 
Marc-André Lureau