[Spice-devel] [PATCH 1/7] qxl-wddm-dod: Return EDID data to the OS

[Christophe de Dinechin]

> On 12 Feb 2017, at 14:09, Yuri Benditovich <yuri.benditovich at daynix.com> wrote:
> 
> Solves failure of HLK "Test for EDID requirements"
> EDID contains capabilities and manufacturer data of
> the emulated display device. Main parameters are:
> Manufacturer code: QXL
> Product ID: 0001
> Working frequency: 75 Hz
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yuri Benditovich <yuri.benditovich at daynix.com>
> ---
> qxldod/QxlDod.cpp | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/qxldod/QxlDod.cpp b/qxldod/QxlDod.cpp
> index cb64209..35cfb68 100755
> --- a/qxldod/QxlDod.cpp
> +++ b/qxldod/QxlDod.cpp
> @@ -371,6 +371,42 @@ NTSTATUS QxlDod::QueryChildStatus(_Inout_ DXGK_CHILD_STATUS* pChildStatus,
>     }
> }
> 
> +static UCHAR edid[256] =
> +{
> +    0x00, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0x00, \
> +    0x47, 0x0C, 0x01, 0x00, 0x41, 0xFA, 0x38, 0x78, \
> +    0xFF, 0x1B, 0x01, 0x04, 0x6A, 0x22, 0x1B, 0x78, \
> +    0xEA, 0x32, 0x31, 0xA3, 0x57, 0x4C, 0x9D, 0x25, \
> +    0x11, 0x50, 0x54, 0x04, 0x43, 0x00, 0x31, 0x4F, \
> +    0x45, 0x4F, 0x61, 0x4F, 0x81, 0x4F, 0x01, 0x01, \
> +    0x01, 0x01, 0x01, 0x01, 0x01, 0x01, 0xBA, 0x2C, \
> +    0x00, 0xA0, 0x50, 0x00, 0x25, 0x40, 0x30, 0x20, \
> +    0x37, 0x00, 0x80, 0x00, 0x10, 0x00, 0x00, 0x1E, \
> +    0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0xFD, 0x00, 0x38, 0x50, 0x1E, \
> +    0x53, 0x0F, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, \
> +    0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0xFC, 0x00, 0x51, \
> +    0x58, 0x4C, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x31, 0x0A, 0x20, \
> +    0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0xFC, \
> +    0x00, 0x51, 0x58, 0x4C, 0x30, 0x30, 0x30, 0x31, \
> +    0x0A, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20, 0x01, 0x6E, \
> +    0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, \
> +    0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, \
> +    0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, \
> +    0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, \
> +    0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, \
> +    0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, \
> +    0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, \
> +    0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, \
> +    0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, \
> +    0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, \
> +    0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, \
> +    0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, \
> +    0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, \
> +    0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, \
> +    0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, \
> +    0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0xF7, \
> +};
> +

Is there a way to explain what these numbers mean, e.g. a comment with a copy of the output of edit-decode?

Christophe