[Spice-devel] Spice protocol behind a Firewall
Christophe Fergeau
cfergeau at redhat.com
Tue Feb 21 10:24:43 UTC 2017
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 10:04:52AM +0100, Oscar Segarra wrote:
> Hi Uri,
>
> Thanks a lot for th example... It looks clarify the security/acl but what
> I'd like to know is if is there any known configuration for an scenario
> like this:
>
> Hypervisor1 (10.0.0.1)
> VM1 (port 5900)
> VM2 (port 5901)
> Hypervisor2 (10.0.0.2)
> VM3 (port 5902)
> VM4 (port 5903)
>
> Of course, VMx can be migrated from one hypervisor to the other (even live).
>
> What I'd like is to configure
>
> Internet --> Proxy (listening 5900, 5901, 5902, 5903) --> Hypervisor1 or
> Hypervisor2 (where the port is up)
>
> I hope not to be the first one with this requirements :S
I think the squid configuration described in
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Virtualization/3.5/html/Installation_Guide/chap-Proxies.html
covers a similar use case.
Christophe
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/spice-devel/attachments/20170221/16020d32/attachment.sig>
More information about the Spice-devel
mailing list