[SyncEvolution] Help needed

[Patrick Ohly]

On Tue, 2016-04-26 at 21:29 +0200, deloptes wrote:
> Patrick Ohly wrote:
> 
> > Good that you found a workaround, but there's still something fishy
> > about this interaction between TDEPIM and gdbus. I was hoping to remove
> > support for libdbus at some point; if you depend on it, I'll have to
> > keep maintaining two D-Bus bindings. Not that I am changing much at the
> > moment, so don't worry ;-}
> 
> Thanks, what would be the "desirable" way to configure?

The default that you were using before is the desirable one, with gdbus
picked  by default instead of libdbus. Unfortunately it is the one which
didn't work for you :-/

-- 
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly

The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.