[systemd-devel] 'tasks' as first-order objects?

[Lennart Poettering]

On Sat, 14.08.10 17:59, Lennart Poettering (lennart at poettering.net) wrote:

> 
> On Fri, 13.08.10 12:16, Bill Nottingham (notting at redhat.com) wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Lennart Poettering (lennart at poettering.net) said: 
> > > Yes, I share the same belief, which is one of the reasons I'd be happy
> > > to rename this.
> > > 
> > > So, Kay and I came up with these two ideas:
> > > 
> > >   KeepAfterExit=
> > >   ActiveAfterExit=
> > 
> > It brings back the word you just dropped elsewhere, but maybe
> > 'FinishedOnExit' or similar?
> 
> But that again trusn the lgoic around.

Haha, I am so funny I didn't even realize I made this self-referential
joke here... ;-)

This should have read "turns the logic around"... ;-)

Lennart

-- 
Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc.