[systemd-devel] 'tasks' as first-order objects?

[Lennart Poettering]

On Fri, 13.08.10 12:16, Bill Nottingham (notting at redhat.com) wrote:

> 
> Lennart Poettering (lennart at poettering.net) said: 
> > Yes, I share the same belief, which is one of the reasons I'd be happy
> > to rename this.
> > 
> > So, Kay and I came up with these two ideas:
> > 
> >   KeepAfterExit=
> >   ActiveAfterExit=
> 
> It brings back the word you just dropped elsewhere, but maybe
> 'FinishedOnExit' or similar?

But that again trusn the lgoic around.

Maybe "ContinueAfterExit="?

Lennart

-- 
Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc.