[systemd-devel] [systemd-commits] TODO
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbyszek at in.waw.pl
Fri Jan 11 12:16:20 PST 2013
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:00:44PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Fri, 11.01.13 11:23, Colin Guthrie (gmane at colin.guthr.ie) wrote:
>
> > >> List of all zsh's man pages appears on top of zshall(1) simply because
> > >> it includes zsh(1) as well :)
> > >
> > > Uh, ah. I prefer having systemdall however as an index only. Not really
> > > convinced such a merged page makes much sense for us.
> >
> > As Tollef said it can be quite useful. I often find myself
> > half-remembering a directive and then going through each of systemd.unit
> > systemd.service and systemd.exec trying to find it each time with
> > variations on the name in case I'm remembering it slightly wrong.
> >
> > An index is useful but a single man page with everything in it what I
> > can grep is really useful at times.
>
> Hmm, there is an item on the TODO list to have an explicit index
> somewhere of all settings, with references to the various man pages we
> have. I.e. something where all settings from the unit files,
> logind.conf, system.conf, journal.conf and so on are listed, with
> references to the actual man pages.
>
> I mean, we have a huge amount of docs now, I somehow think that merging
> that all into one gigantic file doesn't really scale and just creates
> noise (i.e. why would you want systemd-delta's man page in your data set
> if you grep for a config setting?). So I'd rather vote for two index pages:
>
> systemd.index(1) as an index of all man pages we have (i.e. a man
> version of the HTML index we already have)
>
> systemd.config(5) as index of all configuration settings, from all
> configuration files.
What about existing systemd.directives(5)?
Zbyszek
More information about the systemd-devel
mailing list