[systemd-devel] It's really nice when dbus crash on a +systemd...
hw at travelping.com
Sun Jan 27 13:45:29 PST 2013
Hey, i always thought systemd is Using dbus Messaging but not rely or depends on the DBUS daemon? Why a crash has such
An impact on a system?
Is it because of the desktop is started this way or because the communications is broken totally?
Many thanks for advise.
### Sent from a mobile device. Sorry for brevity and typos... ###
On 27.01.2013, at 22:39, "Francesco Riosa (Google+)" <noreply-1feb779d at plus.google.com> wrote:
> It's really nice when dbus crash on a +systemd started system, the desktop (kde) obviously is broken but you loose the console too.
> Why? because system start them on demand, but cannot work w/o dbus so Ctrl+Alt+F2 bring you to nowhere ...
> Ctrl+Alt+Canc? No way systemd is locked
> Solution? Hard reboot, if the kernel is compiled with some magic press Ctrl+print+S for an emergency sync of the disk, followed by Ctrl+print+B to reboot.
> How it happened? Trying to port the gentoo linux-vserver start scripts,...
> Visualizza o commenta il post di Francesco Riosa »
> Con Google+ la condivisione sul Web rispecchia la vita reale. Ulteriori informazioni.
> Entra in Google+
> Hai ricevuto questo messaggio perché Francesco Riosa lo ha condiviso con systemd-devel at lists.freedesktop.org. Annulla iscrizione a queste email.
> Non puoi rispondere a questa email. Visualizza il post per aggiungere un commento.
> Google Inc., 1600 Amphitheatre Pkwy, Mountain View, CA 94043 USA
> systemd-devel mailing list
> systemd-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the systemd-devel