[systemd-devel] It's really nice when dbus crash on a +systemd...

[Holger Winkelmann]

Hey, i always thought systemd is Using dbus Messaging but not rely or depends on the DBUS daemon? Why a crash has such
An impact on a system? 

Is it because of the desktop is started this way or because the communications is broken totally?

Many thanks for advise.

--

Holger Winkelmann
Travelping GmbH
+49-171-5594745

### Sent from a mobile device. Sorry for brevity and typos... ###

On 27.01.2013, at 22:39, "Francesco Riosa (Google+)" <noreply-1feb779d at plus.google.com> wrote:

> 
> 	
> It's really nice when dbus crash on a +systemd started system, the desktop (kde) obviously is broken but you loose the console too.
> Why? because system start them on demand, but cannot work w/o dbus so Ctrl+Alt+F2 bring you to nowhere ...
> Ctrl+Alt+Canc? No way systemd is locked
> Solution? Hard reboot, if the kernel is compiled with some magic press Ctrl+print+S for an emergency sync of the disk, followed by Ctrl+print+B to reboot.
> How it happened? Trying to port the gentoo linux-vserver start scripts,...
> Visualizza o commenta il post di Francesco Riosa »
> Con Google+ la condivisione sul Web rispecchia la vita reale. Ulteriori informazioni.
> Entra in Google+
> Hai ricevuto questo messaggio perché Francesco Riosa lo ha condiviso con systemd-devel at lists.freedesktop.org. Annulla iscrizione a queste email.
> Non puoi rispondere a questa email. Visualizza il post per aggiungere un commento.
> Google Inc., 1600 Amphitheatre Pkwy, Mountain View, CA 94043 USA
> 
> _______________________________________________
> systemd-devel mailing list
> systemd-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/attachments/20130127/cab1084f/attachment-0001.html>