[systemd-devel] runtime directories for services vs. tmpfiles
mbiebl at gmail.com
Wed Jul 17 02:07:15 PDT 2013
2013/7/16 Lennart Poettering <lennart at poettering.net>:
> I'd be very conservative regarding adding full tmpfiles support into
> unit files directly. Instead, I'd suggest adding two very minimal, very
> specific new unit file settings:
> If RuntimeDirectory= is set we'd create it and chown() it to the UID/GID
> set with User= and Group=. We'd apply the mode specified in
> RuntimeDirectoryMode= to it.
What about daemons which drop privileges on their own? Shouldn't we
provide a directive to set the directory owner/group?
If this scheme is not flexible enough to cover the vast majority of
all cases (for services), then I fear we'd end up half of the services
using RuntimeDirectory, the other half a tmpfile. And that imho would
be even more confusing.
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?
More information about the systemd-devel