[systemd-devel] Newbie question - Requires doesn't work properly
salil GK
gksalil at gmail.com
Wed Nov 20 22:57:44 PST 2013
Thanks David
The trick you suggested for point 3 may not work in my case. What happens
is - my process may be busy with some other activity during which time it
will fail to send periodic message to systemd. After a while it will come
out of it's loop and ready to serve. But during this time system would have
already marked the process as failed. As the has come back to it's regular
working state, I don't want to kill the process or restart the process. As
far as clients which are dependent on the service is concerned - service is
in good shape but for systemd it is in failed state. so I would like to
change the state of the service to active (running) at this time so that my
service management framework also would be in good shape.
Thanks
Salil
On 21 November 2013 12:06, David Timothy Strauss <david at davidstrauss.net>wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 4:33 PM, salil GK <gksalil at gmail.com> wrote:
> > 3. One more use case I can think of is - if the process fail to send
> > heartbeat message ( WATCHDOG ) for some time and later it starts sending
> -
> > because of some time. So during the time WATCHDOG notification is missing
> > process can be marked as failed and the moment notification start coming,
> > can it be marked as active-running ?
>
> I'm not sure, but this would be easy to test. You could also restart
> on failed watchdog if you want systemd to react.
>
> > 4. Is there way systemd can notify me in case a watchdog timeout
> happens
> > for a service - like systemd calls some program or write to some socket
> etc.
> > So basically in case any service fails because of watchdog timeout, I
> would
> > like to know asynchronously. Is there any way I can configure this.
>
> We typically poll systemctl --failed periodically as part of our
> monitoring.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/attachments/20131121/ac479d15/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the systemd-devel
mailing list