[systemd-devel] [PATCH 1/3] build-sys: use pkgconfig and lz4 and bump version

Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbyszek at in.waw.pl
Sun Dec 7 10:54:49 PST 2014


On Sun, Dec 07, 2014 at 01:45:13PM -0500, Dave Reisner wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 07, 2014 at 07:32:38PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > The new frame api should be released in v. 125.
> > ---
> >  configure.ac | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
> > index 356a3c3d67..94e6a3b54a 100644
> > --- a/configure.ac
> > +++ b/configure.ac
> > @@ -565,7 +565,7 @@ AM_CONDITIONAL(HAVE_XZ, [test "$have_xz" = "yes"])
> >  have_lz4=no
> >  AC_ARG_ENABLE(lz4, AS_HELP_STRING([--enable-lz4], [Enable optional LZ4 support]))
> >  AS_IF([test "x$enable_lz4" == "xyes"], [
> > -        AC_CHECK_HEADERS(lz4.h,
> > +        PKG_CHECK_MODULES(LZ4, [ liblz4 >= 125 ],
> >                 [AC_DEFINE(HAVE_LZ4, 1, [Define in LZ4 is available]) have_lz4=yes],
> >                 [AC_MSG_ERROR([*** LZ4 support requested but headers not found])])
> 
> This is potentially misleading. The headers might be found, but miss the
> version requirement. We do a similar dance for kmod as we explicitly
> depend on kmod>=15.
I don't understand. This checks the pkgconfig file for the version. Why do you
think this might not be enough?

Zbyszek


More information about the systemd-devel mailing list