[systemd-devel] [PATCH 1/2] tmpfiles.d: split files to cope with split packages.
Lennart Poettering
lennart at poettering.net
Thu Oct 2 00:22:27 PDT 2014
On Tue, 30.09.14 14:36, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri (gustavo.barbieri at intel.com) wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 04:26:38AM +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 06:12:50PM -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> > > etc.conf was selectively (using m4) using resolved link, now this is
> > > moved to systemd-resolved.conf file. The etc.conf can be static and
> > > does not need to be generated anymore.
> > >
> > > systemd.conf was doing all the journal setup, now this is moved to
> > > systemd-journald.conf file.
> > Is this useful? We don't support journald-less setups.
>
> I did forget about this part but it is important, so here it is:
>
> I just tested, although journald-less systems are not supported,
> they work beautifully (as beautify as it can).
>
> and we run great without a dbus-daemon, even if not running kdbus as
> systemctl bus is private and we can do with that (I didn't even think
> about that, someone at #systemd alerted me and it will help to stop
> those people that complain about dbus usage and that we could "just do
> socket", the private socket is basically the same, but the protocol is
> a standard and not just some random handcrafted one).
It's great if this works, and people can do whatever they want with
the code. But this is nothing we want to support upstream. In upstream
neither udev, nor dbus, nor the journal are optional. If people want
to make that work, they can do this downstream.
resolved, networkd, timesyncd are optional, for these it's OK to make
the necessary changes upstream.
Lennart
--
Lennart Poettering, Red Hat
More information about the systemd-devel
mailing list