[systemd-devel] [PATCH 1/2] Update IFA_MAX adding IFA_FLAGS
Alexander Sverdlin
alexander.sverdlin at gmail.com
Wed Apr 8 11:04:30 PDT 2015
Hello Lennart,
On 08/04/15 12:57, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> Fixes the following compilation problem:
>> > src/libsystemd/sd-rtnl/rtnl-types.c:361:9: error: array index in initializer exceeds array bounds
>> > [IFA_FLAGS] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
>> > ^
>> > src/libsystemd/sd-rtnl/rtnl-types.c:361:9: error: (near initialization for 'rtnl_address_types')
>> >
>> > Also include if_addr.h into missing.h so that it's possible to
>> > redefine __IFA_MAX.
> I feel a bit uneasy about changing definitions from the header
Hmm, that's what actually happened in 81577dc2, for instance...
> files. Adding is fine, but altering them is something we should be
> carefuly with. Hence I commited a different fix now:
Oh, this is cryptic, especially for people familiar with netlink, but not introduced to patching
missing.h... This is error prone, because one requires such not obvious construct in every place
where IFA_FLAGS will be used. It will be eventually detected by compiler, but it's far more safe
to redefine the IFA_MAX...
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/commit/?id=de79f906ab614dd0d53129c4d4aa18a964864f39
>
> Please test!
Though, it compiles fine now.
Alex.
More information about the systemd-devel
mailing list