[systemd-devel] user/session buses

[Michał Zegan]

Ahm, I understand, Although it's actually a pitty. I believe it could be 
useful in some cases notably remote login, not quite sure though.


W dniu 22.08.2015 o 16:58, Mantas Mikulėnas pisze:
>
> Well, you just wouldn't have more than one graphical session. That's 
> part of the general plan afaik.
>
> Note that this is already half-broken, because some of those programs 
> actually *expect* to be unique *per user* – e.g. dconf-daemon for 
> writing to the dconf db – and having two copies of it in two sessions 
> might be bad…
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 22, 2015, 13:36 Michał Zegan <webczat_200 at poczta.onet.pl 
> <mailto:webczat_200 at poczta.onet.pl>> wrote:
>
>     Hello.
>
>     I believe, although may be wrong, that session buses were used to
>     enforce single instances of programs, like a program registered a name
>     on dbus and another instance of the same program could not run.
>     How would it affect user buses in case of multiple graphical user
>     sessions?
>     _______________________________________________
>     systemd-devel mailing list
>     systemd-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
>     <mailto:systemd-devel at lists.freedesktop.org>
>     http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/attachments/20150822/fcc61979/attachment.html>