[systemd-devel] user/session buses

[Mantas Mikulėnas]

Well, personally, I'd much prefer it if remote login could *attach* to an
existing local session, e.g. the way RDP / Terminal Services works on
Windows. (AFAIK a Wayland compositor *could* almost do that…)

On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 6:27 PM, Michał Zegan <webczat_200 at poczta.onet.pl>
wrote:

> Ahm, I understand, Although it's actually a pitty. I believe it could be
> useful in some cases notably remote login, not quite sure though.
>
>
> W dniu 22.08.2015 o 16:58, Mantas Mikulėnas pisze:
>
> Well, you just wouldn't have more than one graphical session. That's part
> of the general plan afaik.
>
> Note that this is already half-broken, because some of those programs
> actually *expect* to be unique *per user* – e.g. dconf-daemon for writing
> to the dconf db – and having two copies of it in two sessions might be bad…
>
> On Sat, Aug 22, 2015, 13:36 Michał Zegan < <webczat_200 at poczta.onet.pl>
> webczat_200 at poczta.onet.pl> wrote:
>
>> Hello.
>>
>> I believe, although may be wrong, that session buses were used to
>> enforce single instances of programs, like a program registered a name
>> on dbus and another instance of the same program could not run.
>> How would it affect user buses in case of multiple graphical user
>> sessions?
>> _______________________________________________
>> systemd-devel mailing list
>> systemd-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> systemd-devel mailing list
> systemd-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
>
>


-- 
Mantas Mikulėnas <grawity at gmail.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/attachments/20150822/b9d62491/attachment.html>