[systemd-devel] Completion of error handling
Kay Sievers
kay at vrfy.org
Sat Jul 25 06:53:41 PDT 2015
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 8:11 AM, SF Markus Elfring
<elfring at users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>> We accept contributions only in git-format-patch frmatted patches,
>> best via github PRs.
>
> The higher level patch formats I'm trying to make you aware of will also
> result in file changes which can be integrated by this content management
> interface depending on your general acceptance for corresponding
> software evolution.
>
> Examples:
> * Scripts in the semantic patch language can be processed for occasional
> patch generation by the Coccinelle software.
> http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/papers.php
>
> * Aspect files could be transformed during an enhanced build process
> by the AspectC++ software.
> http://aspectc.org/Publications.php
>
>
>>> Would you like to give thoughts for the extension of the software development
>>> toolbox a chance?
>>
>> I am sorry, your questions are not useful, because too generic.
>
> I hope that the software situation can also be improved by development methodology
> and technology you are more familiar with at the moment.
> Would you like to reopen a specific bug report for example?
No, systemd does not plan to do anything here.
> https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/644
>
> Update candidates:
> * How do you think about to look at calls for functions from the application
> programming interface "POSIX threads" again?
>
> * Does the usage of file output functions need another look?
No, nothing needs more discussion or attention in the context of systemd.
None of the above seems contain anything useful or is expected to
contribute anything useful in the future. This is a development
mailing list, we discuss patches and actual code, and not vague
questions like you ask. Please stop posting this stuff or asking any
more questions like this.
Thanks,
Kay
More information about the systemd-devel
mailing list