[systemd-devel] Stricter handling of failing mounts during boot under systemd - crap idea !

[jon]

On Mon, 2015-06-29 at 14:21 +0000, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
> 
> On 06/29/2015 02:08 PM, jon wrote:
> > https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/release-notes/ch-information.en.html#systemd-upgrade-default-init-system
> >
> > I just installed debian 8.1, on the whole my reaction is mixed, one
> > thing however really pisses me off more than any other
> >
> > "5.6.1. Stricter handling of failing mounts during boot under systemd"
> >
> > This is not "Stricter" it is a change in default behaviour.
> >
> > This change is a shit idea, who do I shout at to get the behaviour
> > modified to back to sensible ?
> >
> 
> The systemd community only recommends what downstream consumers of it 
> should do but does not dictate or othewise decided anything how those 
> consumers eventually decide to implement systemd so if you dont like how 
> systemd is implemented in Debian you should voice your concerns with the 
> Debian community.
Ok

Who writes/maintains the code that parses "nofail" in /etc/fstab ?
Who writes/maintains the typical system boot code (whatever has replaced
rc.sysinit) ?

I suspect the answer to both is the systemd maintainers, in which case
is this not the correct place to bitch about it ?
 
Thanks,
Jon