[systemd-devel] Vendor default masked service

Lennart Poettering lennart at poettering.net
Tue May 26 07:14:23 PDT 2015

On Tue, 26.05.15 11:53, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (umut at tezduyar.com) wrote:

> Hi,
> I was wondering if we have a way to provide vendor default masked
> service?

Well, so far our thinking was that if the vendor wants to make a unit
completely unavailable he should simply not ship it in the first

What's the usecase for a vendor masking a unit, but installing it? Why
not remove it in the first place entirely?


Lennart Poettering, Red Hat

More information about the systemd-devel mailing list