[systemd-devel] Vendor default masked service
Lennart Poettering
lennart at poettering.net
Tue May 26 07:14:23 PDT 2015
On Tue, 26.05.15 11:53, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (umut at tezduyar.com) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if we have a way to provide vendor default masked
> service?
Well, so far our thinking was that if the vendor wants to make a unit
completely unavailable he should simply not ship it in the first
place.
What's the usecase for a vendor masking a unit, but installing it? Why
not remove it in the first place entirely?
Lennart
--
Lennart Poettering, Red Hat
More information about the systemd-devel
mailing list