[systemd-devel] What I think is really wrong with systemd

[Michał Zegan]

W dniu 16.09.2015 o 15:08, Martin Pitt pisze:
> Michał Zegan [2015-09-16 14:41 +0200]:
>> I actually believe that debian does some splitting, for example pam-systemd
>> module is in a separate package. Actually I feel that particular case is
>> wrong, but it happens there. I mean debian jessie, of course.
> FYI, this is required for supporting Multi-Arch, it's not wrong.

Actually I was not quite right, I think that what annoyed me was that 
the pam_systemd module was not installed by default.
>
> Debian does split the package quite a bit, yes. All libraries, their
> -dev packages, and libnss*/libpam* need to be separate binaries, and
> udev and systemd-sysv need to be separate for supporting other init
> systems still. We also recently split out "systemd-container" for
> nspawn/machinectl/importd etc. so that we can enable all features
> without introducing big new dependencies into minimal systems.
>
> Martin