[systemd-devel] What I think is really wrong with systemd

[Reindl Harald]

Am 16.09.2015 um 17:52 schrieb Kok, Auke-jan H:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 8:38 AM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote:
>> Am 16.09.2015 um 17:13 schrieb Ahmed S. Darwish:
>>>
>>> Not to mention that the same rolling-release model was adopted by
>>> the kernel long time ago for similar reasons and much more ;-)
>>
>> that is *not* true and won't become true by repeat it
>>
>> https://www.kernel.org/
>>
>> mainline:       4.2             2015-08-30
>> stable:         4.1.7           2015-09-13
>> longterm:       3.18.21         2015-08-31
>>
>> only systemd upstream has from the core component a "that is the new version
>> with no major/minor" attitude and the kernel is the very last project to
>> compare given "longterm: 2.6.32.67 2015-06-03"
>
> nonsense. Only one of those three mentioned is actually "the linux
> kernel". The other two are independently running forks that "the linux
> kernel" maintainer does not maintain.
>
> So, he's actually entirely correct to paraphrase that the linux kernel
> community is using a rolling release model. The fact that individuals
> make "respins" that follow a non-rolling release model does not
> diminish the truth of that in any way possible

nonsense

4.1.x will get a lot more updates while 4.2.x get them too
systemd never ever had any minor release

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/attachments/20150917/fe3256c4/attachment.sig>