[systemd-devel] Network Interface Names: solution for a desktop OS
Greg KH
gregkh at linuxfoundation.org
Mon Apr 11 20:21:32 UTC 2016
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 08:49:48PM +0200, Xen wrote:
> It will just not be "predictable" when you remove or add hardware,
> because that reorders the resulting lists.
>
> Ie, if you have:
>
> ethernet0
> ethernet1
> ethernet2
>
> And you add a new device, it might become:
>
> ethernet0
> ethernet1
> ethernet2 <-- new device
> ethernet3
>
> But is that really an issue?
Yes, it is, otherwise if it wasn't, this scheme is identical to the "no
naming scheme at all"
> You can put usb devices at the end of the list.
Why last? How do you know they go last when scanning? How do you know
when / if they will show up? What about 2 USB devices? 3?
It looks like you really want the old-style naming scheme, which is
great, you have the ability to roll back to that. Please do so.
thanks,
greg k-h
More information about the systemd-devel
mailing list