[systemd-devel] Transaction contains conflicting jobs 'restart' and 'stop'

Michal Sekletar msekleta at redhat.com
Wed May 11 07:58:09 UTC 2016


On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 10:11 PM, Orion Poplawski <orion at cora.nwra.com> wrote:

> Can't the stop of iptables be dropped because the service is already stopped
> (or more likely not even present)?

Isn't this the case already? I simplified your scenario, i.e. A
conflicts B and C is part of both A and B. If I first start B and C
and then issue stop for B, then follow-up restart of A doesn't produce
an error. I observed the problem only after trying to restart A when B
and C were running.

Michal


More information about the systemd-devel mailing list