[systemd-devel] What is the point of making timesyncd bus-activatible?
Arian Van Putten
arian at wire.com
Tue May 19 09:30:45 UTC 2020
Hey list,
systemd-timesyncd has an Alias=dbus-org.freedesktop.timesync1.service and
an accompanying dbus service file too.
It is started in early boot; `Before=sysinit.target` so why would making
it dubs-activatible ever make sense? It is always started way before
dbus.service itself is started.
It also seems that the unit type is not Type=dbus (and doesn't set a
BusName) which confuses me a bit. So maybe I'm misunderstanding how dbus
integration works here. Ist that because we want to consider the services
"ready" before they even register a name on the bus?
Similarly systemd-resolved.service and systemd-networkd.service have such
aliases whilst they're both pulled in by `multi-user.target` and also do
not have `Type=dbus` and `BusName=` set.
What are the reasons for that? For resolve1 i guess it makes sense as you
dont have to think about ordering when making dns calls in services. But I
am still confused why it is not of Type=dbus. Is that because it not only
gives a dbus API but also a DNS api?
Looking forward to your answers.
--
*Zeta Project Germany GmbH *l Rosenthaler Straße 40,
<https://maps.google.com/?q=Rosenthaler+Stra%C3%9Fe+40,%C2%A0+10178+Berlin,%C2%A0+Germany&entry=gmail&source=g>10178
Berlin,
<https://maps.google.com/?q=Rosenthaler+Stra%C3%9Fe+40,%C2%A0+10178+Berlin,%C2%A0+Germany&entry=gmail&source=g>
Germany
<https://maps.google.com/?q=Rosenthaler+Stra%C3%9Fe+40,%C2%A0+10178+Berlin,%C2%A0+Germany&entry=gmail&source=g>
Geschäftsführer/Managing Director: Morten J. Broegger, Dylan Riley
HRB 149847 beim Handelsregister Charlottenburg, Berlin
VAT-ID DE288748675
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/attachments/20200519/bea5c379/attachment.htm>
More information about the systemd-devel
mailing list