[Telepathy] XMPP 1-to-1 -> MUC migration

Ivan Vučica ivucica at gmail.com
Mon Dec 7 04:57:02 PST 2009


On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 13:40, Danielle Madeley <
danielle.madeley at collabora.co.uk> wrote:

> On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 09:38 +0000, Will Thompson wrote:
>
> > They don't provide the element which tells you it's an upgrade? The PDF
> > on <http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22768> suggests they're
> > supposed to send <continue/>, but without thread=''.
>
> It seems they do not, from my tests:
>
>        * message xmlns='jabber:client' from='
> private-chat-dc9053c4-dc12-4615-8a01-62e06582b197 at groupchat.google.com'
> to='danielle.madeley at collabora.co.uk' jid='danni.m at gmail.com'
>            * x xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/muc#user'
>                * invite from='dannielle.meyer at gmail.com/gmail.24E97497'
>                    * reason
>                        "You've been invited to this chat room!"
>            * x xmlns='google:nosave' value='disabled'
>            * record xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/archive' otr='false'
>
> So no, it seems that they don't comply with their own spec even. :o(
>


It sounds to me like they're not continuing old conversation (despite UI
behaving like they are), they're opening a completely new one. Too often
programmers work around specs instead of complying with them.

When did last version of Gtalk come out anyways?

-- 
Regards,

Ivan Vučica
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/telepathy/attachments/20091207/b3971bf4/attachment.html 


More information about the telepathy mailing list