[waffle] [PATCH] HACKING.txt: Don't recommend Apache 2.0 for contributions

[Jordan Justen]

Since waffle changed from Apache 2.0 to BSD in
367378863bcc6801f5ae5ad786c09d39e0890370, we should avoid accepting
contributions under that license for the same reasons.

Signed-off-by: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen at intel.com>
---
 My recommendation is that the wording should request that BSD be
 used, but note that MIT licensed code would also be accepted.

 The reason is that I think the fewer licenses used, the easier time
 people have determining how they can use the library.

 Isn't waffle still 100% BSD-2-clause?

 HACKING.txt | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/HACKING.txt b/HACKING.txt
index a6a29fb..46a9b2d 100644
--- a/HACKING.txt
+++ b/HACKING.txt
@@ -142,8 +142,7 @@ organization to that file's copyright header.
 If adding new files, do not use a copyleft license (such as the GPL). All
 Waffle source code must be licensed under a liberal opensource license (such as
 BSD).  To reduce license proliferation, Waffle prefers (but does not require)
-that new code be licensed under one of the following licenses: BSD, MIT, Apache
-2.0.
+that new code be licensed under one of the following licenses: BSD, MIT.
 
 
 References
-- 
2.1.0