[waffle] [PATCH 05/10] nacl: emit errors when things fail

[Emil Velikov]

On 25 March 2015 at 06:21, Tapani <tapani.palli at intel.com> wrote:
> I don't quite agree with this change, IMO the behavior is fine as it matches
> how other backends work. The 'gl' prefix is "internal detail", user should
> not be trying to dlopen some other functions anyway?
>
I'm not 100% sure about your concern here - are you suggesting a
change from WAFFLE_ERROR_UNKNOWN to WAFFLE_ERROR_INTERNAL, or that the
user does not deserve to get any message on failure ? One could think
about pushing the gl check further up to the waffle internal api but
considering this is the only place waffle cares it's ok as is.

Thanks
Emil