Benchmark of Wayland

[microcai]

2010/11/18 Justin Lee <justinlee5455 at gmail.com>

> This kind of latency due to OS scheduling could be eliminated by
> direct-procedure call. That is, the client passes the GEM buffer to
> the server just like it passes the GEM buffer as an argument to a
> function. In this approach, the compositor is not a process. Rather,
> the compositor is just a function live in the client program. So there
> will be no context switches.
>

So ? Move wayland entirely into the kernel ? Then there will be no delay.
And that's probably what MacOSX and Windows NT does. As far as I know,
Darwin uses quantz (AGL?)  as basis of their GUI system , but WIndows NT
uses bullshit GDI .....
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/wayland-devel/attachments/20101118/922d546a/attachment.htm>