wayland is no better that Xegl ?
Daniel Stone
daniel at fooishbar.org
Sat Jun 16 18:29:53 PDT 2012
Hi,
On 17 June 2012 02:06, microcai <microcai at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> wayland is build on KMS and EGL
It can be, but not necessarily.
> Xegl doesn't require KMS but if you have KMS that will be fine.
>
> wayland forces apps to use GL
It doesn't.
> but Xegl translates every Xlib call to GL call.
Which isn't very useful, because it's not a clean and direct
translation. (And no-one wants to render using Xlib, it's not a
useful drawing API.)
> wayland lost net work transparency, Xegl not.
Wayland will have network transparency.
> wayland is not compatible with X, while Xegl does.
See xwayland and the Weston-under-X11 nesting.
> .....
>
> many many many ....
>
> So why don't we improve Xegl rather than renivent the wheel?
Because it's not usefully possible.
More information about the wayland-devel
mailing list