wayland is no better that Xegl ?

Daniel Stone daniel at fooishbar.org
Sat Jun 16 18:29:53 PDT 2012


Hi,

On 17 June 2012 02:06, microcai <microcai at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> wayland is build on KMS and EGL

It can be, but not necessarily.

> Xegl doesn't require KMS but if you have KMS that will be fine.
>
> wayland forces apps to use GL

It doesn't.

>  but Xegl translates every Xlib call to GL call.

Which isn't very useful, because it's not a clean and direct
translation.  (And no-one wants to render using Xlib, it's not a
useful drawing API.)

> wayland lost net work transparency, Xegl not.

Wayland will have network transparency.

> wayland  is not compatible with X, while Xegl does.

See xwayland and the Weston-under-X11 nesting.

> .....
>
> many many many ....
>
> So why don't we improve Xegl rather than renivent the wheel?

Because it's not usefully possible.


More information about the wayland-devel mailing list