Compiz is Dead - Beryl Lives Again? Enter - Northfield/Norwood

Casey Dahlin cdahlin at redhat.com
Mon Mar 25 11:53:18 PDT 2013


On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:51:07PM -0600, Scott Moreau wrote:
> Yes, there is no reason to fork libwayland. And I don't feel this is a
> true fork, just a temporary rename to avoid the confusion it might
> otherwise cause, remaining under the 'wayland' name. Wayland has been
> in my github repo since I've uploaded it there. The only difference
> now is, the name has been changed and an official fork announcement
> has been made by request.

...ok. I'll leave how exactly that's less confusing as an exercise to the
reader.

Seriously, if you'd just forked Weston and left Wayland alone I'd be on your
side. Even happy. This, however, is just making a political mess.

--CJD
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/wayland-devel/attachments/20130325/7d070224/attachment-0001.pgp>


More information about the wayland-devel mailing list