[PATCH] Extend wl_surface protocol [reminder]
Axel Davy
davy at clipper.ens.fr
Sun Nov 3 14:39:48 PST 2013
Thanks for this.
I've just realized that using 32 bits ints won't be sufficient.
Is there a way in the protocol to have requests with 64 bits int args,
and callback with 64 bits int args too?
Axel Davy
Jiergir Ogoerg wrote :
> Just a reminder on how clocks differ (on LInux) from one another,
> taken from here:
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-man/msg00973.html
> Needless to say, gettimeofday() should be avoided.
>
> CLOCK_REALTIME
> - can jump
> - can slew
> - if ntp is running this clock is always kept close to GMT. even if
> hardware is not 100% correct, ntp will correct everything over time.
>
> CLOCK_MONOTONIC
> - cannot jump
> - can slew !!! (because of ntp)
> - it is not kept in sync with GMT. but the "speed" of seconds is kept
> in sync with GMT by varying it constantly by ntp.
>
> CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW
> - cannot jump
> - cannot slew !
> - the speed of seconds is not the same as the speed of GMT seconds
> since the hardware timer is never 100% exact and ntp daemon does NOT
> have influence here
>
>
>
> --------------------
> /**
> *Just one question. Which clock is being used. Ideally a monotony one, or
> *even better, a configurable one. We would normally not want these
> *timestamps affected by the user changing the system time.
> **/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> wayland-devel mailing list
> wayland-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/wayland-devel/attachments/20131103/b07754f6/attachment.html>
More information about the wayland-devel
mailing list