Where should project Weston go?

[Giulio Camuffo]

2014-12-12 13:29 GMT+02:00 Daniel Stone <daniel at fooishbar.org>:
> Hi,
>
> On 10 December 2014 at 23:21, Bryce Harrington <bryce at osg.samsung.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> An idea I've been kicking around would be to *require* Reviewed-by on
>> all patches.  Now, you'd probably think this would *slow* things down,
>> but consider this:  If as a patch submitter I know I have to get
>> someone's review, then I'm going to be more motivated to give other
>> people reviews myself.  I will also find that by making my patches
>> easier to review, they'll get a Reviewed-by faster, and thus will land
>> faster.
>
>
> Oooh, whilst we're talking about requirements for merging stuff ... how
> about enforcing decent Doxygen bits as a hard requirement for merging
> anything big-ish? Be that internal interfaces inside Weston, or protocol
> changes.

I think we can try this. The other project with this policy that i
know of is Qt, and it has great documentation.


--
Giulio

>
> Cheers,
> Daniel