Where should project Weston go?

[Pekka Paalanen]

On Fri, 12 Dec 2014 14:17:58 +0200
Giulio Camuffo <giuliocamuffo at gmail.com> wrote:

> 2014-12-12 13:29 GMT+02:00 Daniel Stone <daniel at fooishbar.org>:
> >
> > Oooh, whilst we're talking about requirements for merging stuff ... how
> > about enforcing decent Doxygen bits as a hard requirement for merging
> > anything big-ish? Be that internal interfaces inside Weston, or protocol
> > changes.
> 
> I think we can try this. The other project with this policy that i
> know of is Qt, and it has great documentation.

Then we should probably start generating some docs from Weston, too. :-)

What's the criterion? All completely new WL_EXPORT functions?


Thanks,
pq