Stabilizing wl_scaler protocol extension

Alexander Preisinger alexander.preisinger at gmail.com
Tue Sep 16 06:40:50 PDT 2014


2014-09-16 13:51 GMT+02:00 Pekka Paalanen <ppaalanen at gmail.com>:

> On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 13:26:12 +0200
> Alexander Preisinger <alexander.preisinger at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi pq,
> >
> > I use it in my wayland-next branch (for unstable wayland stuff) of the
> mpv
> > player: http://mpv.io/
> > In this commit:
> >
> https://github.com/mpv-player/mpv/commit/77cc885b44a9e95e5c3c9ae4961b9958ff5cf643
>
> Good to know, thanks.
>
> > I only just now realized that I should just use set_destination for my
> use
> > case.
> > So setting the destination separately is definitely a use case and I
> think
> > the set request is redundant.
>
> True, but I'm worried how many upset people there will be if I break
> the protocol during the migration by removing or renaming something. :-)
> There should be no-one as it's all experimental still, but...
>
>
I was just voicing my opinion for this question:

> - Should wl_viewport.set be removed as completely redundant?

Maybe I understood it wrong?

Best Regards,

Alexander
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/wayland-devel/attachments/20140916/9a17cf20/attachment.html>


More information about the wayland-devel mailing list