Stabilizing wl_scaler protocol extension
alexander.preisinger at gmail.com
Tue Sep 16 06:40:50 PDT 2014
2014-09-16 13:51 GMT+02:00 Pekka Paalanen <ppaalanen at gmail.com>:
> On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 13:26:12 +0200
> Alexander Preisinger <alexander.preisinger at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi pq,
> > I use it in my wayland-next branch (for unstable wayland stuff) of the
> > player: http://mpv.io/
> > In this commit:
> Good to know, thanks.
> > I only just now realized that I should just use set_destination for my
> > case.
> > So setting the destination separately is definitely a use case and I
> > the set request is redundant.
> True, but I'm worried how many upset people there will be if I break
> the protocol during the migration by removing or renaming something. :-)
> There should be no-one as it's all experimental still, but...
I was just voicing my opinion for this question:
> - Should wl_viewport.set be removed as completely redundant?
Maybe I understood it wrong?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the wayland-devel