Wayland not MIT-licensed / FAQ wrong
kamikazow at gmx.de
Thu May 28 05:06:50 PDT 2015
I'm one of the authors of Wayland's Wikipedia article
While writing it we noticed some discrepancies in your licensing.
Your FAQ states that Wayland is MIT-licensed
<http://wayland.freedesktop.org/faq.html#heading_toc_j_1> although the actual
license text <http://cgit.freedesktop.org/wayland/wayland/tree/COPYING> uses
the wording from the deprecated Historical Permission Notice and Disclaimer
(HPND) license <http://opensource.org/licenses/HPND>.
This, btw, also leads to the weird situation that this particular wording has
not been declared a Free Software license and GPL-compatible by the FSF (even
though there are no clauses that would prevent that).
The HPND is also not just a simple re-wording of the MIT license because the
HPND carries a no-promotion clause like §3 of the 3-clause BSD license
The easy but still awkward solution (because the HPND is deprecated) is to
simply fix the FAQ.
However, I'd suggest to replace the HPND text with the 3-clause BSD license.
The 3-clause BSD license is functionally the same, just with different wording.
As such replacing the license text would IMO not be a re-licensing of Wayland
in the sense that each developer (or 95%, according to Mozilla
<https://blogs.fsfe.org/ciaran/?p=58>) would have to agree with it.
As I see it, it would merely be a editorial change like correcting bad grammar
or a typo.
More information about the wayland-devel