[RFC wayland 1/2] server: implement intact resources

Pekka Paalanen ppaalanen at gmail.com
Thu Nov 19 01:37:23 PST 2015


On Mon, 23 Mar 2015 13:22:00 +0200
Giulio Camuffo <giuliocamuffo at gmail.com> wrote:

> 2015-03-23 12:00 GMT+02:00 Marek Chalupa <mchqwerty at gmail.com>:
> > Destroyed seems confusing to me too, since the resource is not really
> > destroyed. What about inert or unalive ?
> 
> Inert is ok, imho. On the client side they are called zombie
> objects... maybe for consistency it'd be better to keep that here too.

Sorry for being so late, but "zombie" is actually a used term in
libwayland. It is not synonymous to "inert".

A zombie object is an object that has been destroyed on the client
side, but the server has not yet acknowledged it and may be sending
events through it. These events will be silently dropped in
libwayland-client.

An inert object is a real existing protocol object on both sides of the
connection. An inert object is only semantically "dead" - it depends on
the interface specification on what it actually means.


Thanks,
pq
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 811 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/wayland-devel/attachments/20151119/8be4d817/attachment.sig>


More information about the wayland-devel mailing list