[ANNOUNCE] wayland 1.10.91

[Bryce Harrington]

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 09:49:20AM +0800, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 02:22:45PM -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 03:35:15PM -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 12:11:50PM -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> > > > On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 02:17:23PM +0300, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, 4 May 2016 11:46:23 -0700
> > > > > Bryce Harrington <bryce at osg.samsung.com> wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > > On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 12:55:16AM -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> > > > > > > Here's the alpha for the upcoming 1.11 release.  I'll summarize the
> > > > > > > major features for this release in the beta announcement, but see below
> > > > > > > for the detailed listing.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > The schedule going forward is:
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > >   √ 1.11-alpha on May 3rd.  Major features done by this point.
> > > > 
> > > > It looks like someone (pq?) has marked some patches we decided to leave
> > > > for post-1.11 as deferred in patchwork.  I've followed suit and moved
> > > > other patchsets there which are new APIs or that sound like feature
> > > > work.
> > > 
> > > The patch queue has been fully processed now, except for a few items.
> > > 
> > >   https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/project/wayland/patches/
> > > 
> > > What wasn't landable as-is has been marked as deferred for now, and I
> > > will move them back to the main queue once the release is out.
> > > 
> > > > 3. xwayland drag-and-drop window creation [Carlos]
> > > >    - Looks ok to be but xwayland isn't my area
> > > >    - Been in the queue a long time, but no reviews to date
> > > >    - From the commit description sounds WIP-ish and that there was
> > > >      planned some followup work, but not sure if that happened?
> > > 
> > > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/74663/
> > > 
> > > I'm still unsure what to do with this drag-and-drop patch.  I'm
> > > defaulting to defer it at this point, but it seems to fix a legitimate
> > > crash bug so I'm reticent to kick it down the road without at least a
> > > next action identified.  It's a short patch, can someone take a quick
> > > look and give an opinion on it?
> > 
> > Due to lack of response I've deferred this one.
> 
> As stated in the other mail thread that brought up this patch, I think
> it seems better to land it now, rather than keep crashing.

I completely agree it would be nice to land this, but someone still
needs to actually respond with a review of the patch.

Bryce