[PATCH wayland-protcols v3] unstable: add xdg-toplevel-decoration protocol

Mike Blumenkrantz michael.blumenkrantz at gmail.com
Thu Mar 15 15:04:16 UTC 2018

It seems to me that there is no harm in restating that clients are required
to implement CSD inside a protocol which permits adding a separate,
optional method of window decoration.

Note that it is not an assumption that clients/compositors "support both"
modes, it's a hard requirement that clients/compositors support CSD. If
there is some confusion about this due to other protocols not explicitly
stating that CSD is required then this can easily be remedied by adding
such clauses.

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 3:20 PM Drew DeVault <sir at cmpwn.com> wrote:

> On 2018-03-14  3:16 PM, Simon Ser wrote:
> > However, the situation we'd like to avoid is clients wanting decorations
> not
> > implementing CSD at all and relying on this protocol to show them via
> SSD. What
> > about rewording this sentence to:
> I understand where you're coming from, but this is not something to be
> avoided, rather it should be embraced.
> _______________________________________________
> wayland-devel mailing list
> wayland-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/wayland-devel/attachments/20180315/64eb66a1/attachment.html>

More information about the wayland-devel mailing list